Info Wars: Under the pressure of the Israeli government, BBC boss Mark Thompson bans charity appeal over Gaza

Article HERE

His decision of not allowing for a charity appeal over Gaza to be broadcasted on BBC was made due to huge pressure from the Israeli government concerned on how British audience sees the massacre it inflicted over Gazan children.
Street protests have irrupted in the UK against BBC boss, asking for his resignation and for the charity appeal to be broadcasted.
He said that by broadcasting the charity appeal BBC would assume a political stance in favour of Hamas (this is implied).

Off-topic: two days long have passed since the Israeli government lifted the blocade over the access of journalists in Gaza and we still don´t have any first-hand non-Israeli news about what is really happening there. Without any fear, I must say loud and clear that I really think that Israel committed war crimes in Gaza and they do everything they can to hide this. What other reasons did they have to ban journalists´ access in Gaza? If the United Nations fails to bring Israel under court trial for war crimes in Gaza, this international organization should be immediately dissolved as it failed so many times to provide peace for Earth. If the United Nations allows Israel to get away with this unpunished, all its credibility is lost and morally speaking it should be dissolved.

Ignoranta pasionata a domnului Liviu Antonesei

Raspuns la opiniile publicate aici

Citat: Este interesant cum Israelul, care si-a trimis armata regulata sa-i astimpere pe teroristii Hamas - gruparea este astfel catalogata unanim la nivel mondial.
Observatie: Brazilia, Rusia, India, China, Africa de Sud, Kenya, Pakistan, Albania si alte cateva zeci de state nu considera Hamasul drept organizatie terorista. Folosind logica de papagal pe care o desfasurati in apararea Israelului, BRICS si fosta MNA nu sunt parte a comunitatii internationale. Singurele tari care au dreptul sa constituie comunitatea internationala sunt numai acele tari care au recunoscut Hamasul drept organizatie terorista. Bravo! Excelent. Unde este structura de putere multipolara in aceste afirmatii desantate? "Astampararea" asta a ucis sute de copii in Gaza.

Citat: Este interesant cum Israelul [...] tinde sa piarda batalia mediatica si in fata opiniei publice.
Observatie: De ce "uitati" sa spuneti cititorilor ca presa euro-americana nu relateaza de la sursa despre masacrul din Gaza. Ce bine ca "uitati", in mod foarte convenabil, sa spuneti ca Israelul a interzis jurnalistilor non-arabi sa intre in Fasia Gaza. Pana si americanii cand au invadat Irakul au avut sute de jurnalisti cu ei in tancuri. Aruncati o afirmatie si nu o sprijiniti cu argumente.

Citat: Tipul acesta de "umanism", sa ne amintim si de manifestatiile contra inarmarii din Vestul anilor saptezeci-optezeci, generos subventionate de Moscova, au facut mai mult rau decit o multime de conflicte locale deschise.
Observatie: ce rau anume au facut aceste manifestatii? Blocul militar SUA a castigat cursa inarmarilor si s-a mers pe sistemul unipolar. Iarasi, aruncati o afirmatie si nu o sprijiniti cu argumente.

Citat: Iar razboiul din Orientul Apropiat a izbucnit exact in ziua in care se infiinta statul Israel, nu si cel palestinian, cum suna rezolutia ONU.
Observatie (colaterala): Invazia din Fasia Gaza a avut loc, in acest caz, in momentul in care doua puteri care se implica de obicei in solutionarea problemelor din Orientul Mijlociu erau intr-o situatie de vid de putere. SUA: presedintele in exercitiu, Bush, era in vacanta, presedintele ales, Obama, era in vacanta. In materie de politica externa SUA n-are decat un presedinte. UE: predarea stafetei de la francezi la cehi. Cine avea datoria formala de a aduce in discutie implicarea UE in masacrul din Gaza? Franta? Cehia? Solana? Iarasi vid de putere, atributii confuze. O atitudine interesanta aici. Oricum cand Obama va fi presedintele SUA niciun soldat evreu nu va mai fi in Gaza. Deja vad ca s-a dat drumul la armistitiu.

Citat: Dar terorismul a devenit un fenomen exploziv - chiar Al Fatah, organizatia lui Yasser Arrafat, primul presedinte al Autoritatii Palestiniene, a fost initial o organizatie terorista, cu liderul sau in frunte. Chiar in momentul de fata, presedintele acesteia apartine unei organizatii moderate, dispuse la pace cu Israelul si la infiintarea unui stat palestinian propriu.
Observatie: Nu este deloc important ca SUA, Israelul, UE si Liga Araba injecteaza milioane de dolari in Autoritatea Palestiniana, facand-o dependenta politic de dorintele sponsorilor? Ce conteaza ca bani europeni finanteaza Al Fatah, fosta organizatie terorista. Probabil ca daca Hamas va renunta la activitatile violente, UE va sari iarasi cu cateva milioane de euro sa linisteasca constiintele birocratilor de la Bruxelles. Traiasca democratia europeana si lipsa ipocrizei morale!

Citat: in vreme ce Hamas, acum la putere prin alegeri, repet (ceea ce spune ceva si despre electoratul palestinian)
Observatie: Dumneavoastra ati avea incredere intr-un partid politic finantat, sa zicem, de Moscova sau Ungaria? De ce palestinienii ar fi trebuit sa aiba incredere in Al Fatah sau Abbas? A fost o rezistenta minima a palestinienilor din Fasia Gaza fata de preluarea controlului de catre Hamas, frica a jucat si ea un rol.

Citat: intreg paragraful de la sfarsitul articolului.
Observatie: Pace spuneti? Este pacea mondiala unul din obiectivele Natiunilor Unite? Oooo, avem la pace din 1945 incoace de nu ne mai saturam. Vietnam, Coreea, Afghanistan, Irak, Rwanda, India, Cecenia, Kosovo, Iugoslavia, Gaza, Liban, Iran etc. Am numarat rapid: din 1984 si pana in 2009 au fost peste 50 de razboaie. Dar ce naiba sa facem? Ca sistemul asta unipolar cu SUA cocotata in varful puterii aduce prosperitate pentru toti "civilizatii", nu? Rusia poate sa se duca la culcare, nu? India sa faca covoare. China sa faca tricouri samd. Sa lasam destinele planetei pe mainile capitalistilor din SUA!

Citat: Se pare ca nu, de vreme ce protestatarii vestici, majoritatea de stinga, deci principial antifascisti, au ajuns deja la manifestari clar antisemite.
Observatie: Niciodata anti-semitismul nu va face parte din ideile miscarii antifasciste contemporane. Faceti o eroare istorica: nazistii au gasit refugiu dupa Al Doilea Razboi Mondial in state arabe, deschizand calea unei colaborari intre conservatorii si nationalistii europeni si islamisti. Plus ca poate ar trebui sa aruncati o privire la ce scrie aici: Many European newspaper commentators are saying that concerns about anti-Semitism in Europe are overblown. They argue that the Jew haters are a tiny minority on the extreme political right who are given far more attention than they deserve. They also say that those concerned about the resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe are confusing legitimate criticism of Israeli policies with anti-Semitism.
Domnule Profesor Antonesei, stati sa-mi pun ochelarii ca poate nu vad eu bine: extreme political right? Si Dumneavoastra spuneti de protestatarii vestici, majoritatea de stinga, deci principial antifascisti, au ajuns deja la manifestari clar antisemite.

Bravo, domnule Profesor Liviu Antonesei, sunteti un comentator excelent! Echidistant, impartial si onest cu cititorii sai. Pun pariu ca puteti scrie despre agresiunea ploii asupra solului, despre razboiul dintre lemn si padure. Deci m-am inselat cand v-am catalogat drept papagal cand emiteati aberatiile acelea despre cum ar trebui sa stam in patru labe fata de Rusia la intalnirea cu Dungaciu din Aula UAIC. Luati-va de manuta cu Alexandru Lazescu si faceti un jurnal neonazist. Ca vad ca de Marius Parciu n-aveti de gand sa va delimitati.
Articolul domnului prof. dr. univ. academician doctor inginer emerit Liviu Antonesei poate fi gasit aici.

P.S. In rest, unde n-am facut observatii, sunt total de acord cu Dumneavoastra.

OUTRAGEOUS: THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION OF GAZA

I couldn´t help noticing that all international organizations which asserted their goal of achieving peace failed to do so. In spite of EU, NATO, UNO efforts to establish planetary peace, during my life I lived 15 regional conflicts. Making these democratic structures unable to represent mankind´s ultimate desire for peace. Therefore I do not accept the political authority of these three Western institutions: EU, UNO and NATO.
There is no non-Arab journalist in Gaza since the beginning of the Israeli massacre of the civilian population almost two weeks ago.
Israel prevented every Western/ American/European journalist from entering Gaza. Why? Because the terrorist state of Israel wants to hide the real extent of the humanitarian disaster in Gaza?
No Western journalist dared to criticize Israel on igniting a malicious information war against the people of Gaza.
All European journalists who speak about the precarious conditions of the civilians in Gaza do not use first-hand Gaza reports. Most of them even use reports from Israeli media about the occupied Gazans. Starting from the way in which Western media covered the Israeli occupation of Gaza I understood that the press in Europe holds no power in the democratic state but it is the perverted information arm of the military leaders.
When a Western journalist speaks about the Israeli "incursion" "offensive" in Gaza, for each occurrence of these terms they say at least ten times: terrorist attacks Hamas, Israeli defense. There is an outrageous imbalance between the way in which the Western media (ALL!) understands to cover the Israeli massacre of the civilian population in Gaza. The Israeli point of view receives far more coverage. For each pro-Palestinian commentator, Western TV channels bring ten pro-Israeli commentators.
This is the point where because of the criminal silence oberved by EU, UNO and USA, I think that the ultimate political change in the Euro-American zone can be achieved only by using terrorism against unrepresentative capitalist structures.
Iraq and Afghanistan did not attack any EU country. No declaration of war was issued between Iraq and Romania, or between Aghanistan and Denmark. This situation will lead to a increased number of terrorist attacks in Europe. This is solely the fault of the unrepresentative democratic leaders in all EU states. Al-Qaida did not attack EU. Why is EU becoming the Americans´ whore in the Middle East?
For the readers interested in media, information and politics issues: compare the way in which thw European media covered the Israeli massacre over Lebanon more than two years ago and see now how the European media is silent about the daily sufferings of the civilians in Gaza who may as well end smashed by Israeli tanks or shot by Israeli teenage soldiers.
So far only Iran, Qatar and Jordan made public criticism against Israel.
And another very disgusting point about European media: there is little interest on showing the real intensity of the demonstrations in the Arab world. Because most of the Arab leaders kept silent about the Israeli genocide, now the extremist feeling among Muslims will lead to tens of thousands of recruits for Al-Qaida.
By the year 2010 there will be five times more Islamic terrorist attacks than between 1990 and 2008. The Muslim anger will be directed not only towards USA but also against EU.

I trust no more the US president-elect Barack Oabama because he did not defend the children and women of Gaza when they were terrorized by the Israeli missiles. Mr. Obama said a lot of things about the US economy, he already behaved as if he were the current US president. He condemned the Mumbay terrorist attacks, but he was silent about Israeli soldiers going on war against Palestinians.
The only sure thing is that when the Black puppy of the Jewish will be confirmed as acting US president, no Israeli soldier will be in Gaza. The terrorist state of Israel will not want to embarass Barack Obama. I lost all confidence in the young US Black man called Barack Obama.

Why did the Israeli Defence Force attack Gaza when there was a power vaccum in USA and EU?
USA has no president now. There is a transition.
EU has no leadership when in comes to foreign policy. The French EU presidency was given to the Czech Republic, but who gives a damn about the Czech EU president? I don´t even know who is he or she. The French washed their hands when they were criticized by the Arab media, saying they were no longer in charge.

God knows how many deaths in Gaza are due to the Israeli murderers! There may be 1000 people killed, entire cities may have been wiped out by the Israeli terrorist. And we don´t have a clue because the media channels we are using are pro-Israel and they are politically attached to the European bureacrats in Bruxelles who are not interested in dealing with the humanitarian crisis.

How is fucking giving a damn about the Christian population of Gaza? Not even the Fascist Pope said anything about this. From our behalf all the Christians in Gaza may die of thirst, hunger, fear or bullet because we are pissing on them. They are hidding in basements, they hear all day long the Israeli bombs and we keep quiet again. The children of Qana died for nothing.

The Israeli declaration of war against Gaza HERE
My European Union recognized the democratic elections held in Gaza which were won by Hamas. The European Union accepted Hamas as a partner for dialogue. HERE
Egyptian actions increase the humanitarian crisis in Gaza HERE

The Israeli killings of Gaza children will bring more Arab young men in Ossama Bin Laden´s hands.
Fragment:

Today, after Israeli air-strikes that killed over 200 Palestinians in Gaza, the Middle East is again seething with rage. Recruiters to the most radical of causes are again cashing in. If Osama Bin Laden is indeed a cave-dweller these days then U.S. intel should be listening out for a booming echo of laughter. Demonstrations across the Arab world and contributors to the ever-proliferating Arabic language news media and blogosphere hold the U.S., and not just Israel, responsible for what happened today (and that is a position taken, for good reasons, by sensible folk, not hard-liners). America’s allies in the region are again running for cover.
HERE.